Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:39:17 -0400
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org>
Cc:        freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Splitting critical libraries from interactive shell in runtime package
Message-ID:  <26631.50741.155084.424170@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <015C4C6B-1CEC-4398-A8B9-CE21E88C617C@tetlows.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

<<On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:43:44 -0700, Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org> said:

> A while ago, I was playing around with building stripped down jails
> based on pkgbase and noticed that /bin/sh and a whole host of
> interactive commands is in the FreeBSD-runtime package. This seemed
> weird to me as my stripped down jail that is intended to run nginx
> should only have the runtime libraries necessary. Including /bin/sh
> and friends is unnecessary and would only enable an attacker to gain
> a foothold more easily.

Part of the functionality of the standard C library is implemented in
the shell.  You probably don't need any of these functions, and maybe
given your security posture you would prefer if they didn't work.
POSIX generally requires a shell.  I think pkgbase is perhaps not
conceived for this application: a shell is not normally thought of as
an optional component.

-GAWollman



help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26631.50741.155084.424170>