Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:03:32 +1200 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Small initarm cleanup Message-ID: <20120609180332.53c42ede@fubar.geek.nz> In-Reply-To: <6B3D6C60-C1C9-442A-A223-C88C42FAE422@bsdimp.com> References: <20120609161132.38066a60@fubar.geek.nz> <6B3D6C60-C1C9-442A-A223-C88C42FAE422@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:32:58 -0600 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > This looks great! I didn't verify each and every instance is exactly > identical, but the quick eyeball check says it looks great. The only difference I noticed is, two files call proc_linkup rather than proc_linkup0. The only difference between these two functions is proc_linkup0 initialises the proc's p_threads tailq then calls proc_linkup. As one of these is in the s3c24x0 version of initarm, which I have hardware for, I have tested it work as expected. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120609180332.53c42ede>