Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:55:40 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Onboard SCSI controller support on Ultra 2 Message-ID: <20050217185349.G53092@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20050217230603.S18907@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <a9fd2434258a08bc12f47247a253f1b4@symacx.com> <a9fd2434258a08bc12f47247a253f1b4@symacx.com> <20050216121647.GB91200@ida.interface-business.de> <20050217024834.GC81013@kt-is.co.kr> <20050217230603.S18907@newtrinity.zeist.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Marius Strobl wrote: > Depends on how it actually works. I can't remember were I read about it > but my impression was that it doesn't work like a shared IRQ in the > usual sense. > Anyway, there were reports in the past that SBus QFE don't work properly > and act like not getting interrupts. Maybe, but it also works -- I have one in my ultra2, and prefer to use it since the PHY in the onboard hme doesn't autodetect right. I have a PCI QFE as well and was getting bizarre panics when I had it in my e450. The onboard one works fine, strangely enough :-) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217185349.G53092>