Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:41:36 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Ceri Davies" <ceri@submonkey.net>, "Kip Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sun4v/include asm.h src/sys/sun4v/sun4v hcall.S interrupt.S support.S t1_copy.S Message-ID: <b1fa29170611231141g4fce1812v244a24c3d2fe4d83@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061123145304.GF973@submonkey.net> References: <200611230225.kAN2PGYi043437@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061123145304.GF973@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sun puts the CDDL into their sendmail, ssh, etc. config files. If its a file
that they touch, they CDDL it. There isn't a whole lot of discrimination
that goes on.
-Kip
On 11/23/06, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:25:16AM +0000, Kip Macy wrote:
> > kmacy 2006-11-23 02:25:16 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/sun4v/include asm.h
> > sys/sun4v/sun4v hcall.S interrupt.S support.S t1_copy.S
> > Log:
> > In contrast to the non-obvious and flexible nature of the optimized
> bcopy in t1_copy.S (which
> > shall retain its CDDL copyright, and thus likely be removed from
> GENERIC) I have removed the CDDL
> > from hcall.S because there is zero flexibility in the implementation
> of hypercalls as they derive
> > directly from the hypervisor interface which is not copyrighted
> (ironically the source for the
> > hypervisor itself is BSD licensed).
> >
> > It is best to start any bikeshed about this as soon as possible.
>
> OK, I'll bite.
>
> > Discussed with: bsdimp
>
> And Sun?
>
> Ceri
> --
> That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
> -- Moliere
>
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170611231141g4fce1812v244a24c3d2fe4d83>