Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:16:15 -0600 (MDT) From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com> To: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com> Cc: Mike Pontillo <mike_p@revenge.pylos.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NICs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991012121527.29012D-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910121102550.17801-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote: > > That said, the Intel EtherExpress family seem to work EXTREMELY well and > > extremely good. I put them in all my customer's "high-end" freebsd boxes > > and in my customer's high-end servers. > > Should have been more explicit, this was for a firewall/VPN box. > Stability of the Win9X boxes is not as much an issue, and the vendors tend > to test better for that environment anyway. Actually, I build firewall boxes here based on FreeBSD-STABLE - And thats where the cheap cards go. :) - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) KD7EHZ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.991012121527.29012D-100000>