Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:39:25 +0100
From:      Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r202719 - in head: . gnu/usr.bin usr.bin usr.bin/bc usr.bin/bc/USD.doc usr.bin/dc usr.bin/dc/USD.doc
Message-ID:  <4B57861D.6040507@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100120223623.GI77705@hoeg.nl>
References:  <201001202130.o0KLUqxq023409@svn.freebsd.org> <20100120223623.GI77705@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 2010. 01. 20. 23:36, Ed Schouten escribió:
>>
>> +# 20100120: replacing GNU bc/dc with BSDL versions
>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/examples/bc/ckbook.b
>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/examples/bc/pi.b
>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/examples/bc/primes.b
>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/examples/bc/twins.b
>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/info/dc.info.gz
>> +OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/examples/bc
>>   # 20100114: removal of ttyslot(3)
>>   OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man3/ttyslot.3.gz
>>   # 20100113: remove utmp.h, replace it by utmpx.h
>>      
> Not that I care about these example files, but why have they been
> removed? Are they GPL licensed as well?
>    
Most probably, yes. They are part of the GNU bc distribution and there 
is no implicit license information inside the files or the Examples 
directory, which imo means the same license apply to these files.

-- 
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer

EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org
WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B57861D.6040507>