Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:17:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r239474 - stable/9/sys/netinet/khelp Message-ID: <201208210217.q7L2H7xY038795@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: lstewart Date: Tue Aug 21 02:17:06 2012 New Revision: 239474 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/239474 Log: MFC r239346: The TCP PAWS fix for kernels with fast tick rates (r231767) changed the TCP timestamp related stack variables to reference ms directly instead of ticks. The h_ertt(4) Khelp module relies on TCP timestamp information in order to calculate its enhanced RTT estimates, but was not updated as part of r231767. Consequently, h_ertt has not been calculating correct RTT estimates since r231767 was comitted, which in turn broke all delay-based congestion control algorithms because they rely on the h_ertt RTT estimates. Fix the breakage by switching h_ertt to use tcp_ts_getticks() in place of all previous uses of the ticks variable. This ensures all timestamp related variables in h_ertt use the same units as the TCP stack and therefore results in meaningful comparisons and RTT estimate calculations. Reported & tested by: Naeem Khademi (naeemk at ifi uio no) Discussed with: bz Modified: stable/9/sys/netinet/khelp/h_ertt.c Directory Properties: stable/9/sys/ (props changed) Modified: stable/9/sys/netinet/khelp/h_ertt.c ============================================================================== --- stable/9/sys/netinet/khelp/h_ertt.c Tue Aug 21 00:05:44 2012 (r239473) +++ stable/9/sys/netinet/khelp/h_ertt.c Tue Aug 21 02:17:06 2012 (r239474) @@ -151,11 +151,13 @@ marked_packet_rtt(struct txseginfo *txsi *prtt_bytes_adjust += *pmeasurenext_len; } else { if (mflag & FORCED_MEASUREMENT) { - e_t->markedpkt_rtt = ticks - *pmeasurenext + 1; + e_t->markedpkt_rtt = tcp_ts_getticks() - + *pmeasurenext + 1; e_t->bytes_tx_in_marked_rtt = e_t->bytes_tx_in_rtt + *pmeasurenext_len - *prtt_bytes_adjust; } else { - e_t->markedpkt_rtt = ticks - txsi->tx_ts + 1; + e_t->markedpkt_rtt = tcp_ts_getticks() - + txsi->tx_ts + 1; e_t->bytes_tx_in_marked_rtt = e_t->bytes_tx_in_rtt - *prtt_bytes_adjust; } @@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ ertt_packet_measurement_hook(int hhook_t */ if (!e_t->dlyack_rx || multiack || new_sacked_bytes) { /* Make an accurate new measurement. */ - e_t->rtt = ticks - txsi->tx_ts + 1; + e_t->rtt = tcp_ts_getticks() - txsi->tx_ts + 1; if (e_t->rtt < e_t->minrtt || e_t->minrtt == 0) e_t->minrtt = e_t->rtt; @@ -477,7 +479,7 @@ ertt_add_tx_segment_info_hook(int hhook_ tp->ts_offset; txsi->rx_ts = ntohl(to->to_tsecr); } else { - txsi->tx_ts = ticks; + txsi->tx_ts = tcp_ts_getticks(); txsi->rx_ts = 0; /* No received time stamp. */ } TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&e_t->txsegi_q, txsi, txsegi_lnk);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208210217.q7L2H7xY038795>