Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:10:06 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: tjr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 Message-ID: <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net> References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107091004.83732.qmail@web52710.mail.yahoo.com> <20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD. I guess that this might worth investigating: http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html (Unfortuantelly, neither tjr@ nor I have touched our patchsets recently. A most recent snapshot of the two patchsets are here: http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid.diff http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid-tjr.diff) Most of the work was to catch up with Aug 2004's -CURRENT, but it might be easier to bring them up-to-date instead of working from the very original patches =3D-) Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3l/+/cVsHxFZiIoRAhjFAJ45jITSKdFqKKpI5Jd8zs3LRN1rLwCeKYCp u46h5ZUnCvFMBiEf1wo0I2M= =UHyn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050107101006.GA2553>