Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:51:23 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 279683] ctld: inconsistent parsing "option" in traditional vs UCL mode
Message-ID:  <bug-279683-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279683

            Bug ID: 279683
           Summary: ctld: inconsistent parsing "option" in traditional vs
                    UCL mode
           Product: Base System
           Version: 15.0-CURRENT
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: bin
          Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: asomers@FreeBSD.org

ctld.conf(5) says that both the portal-group context and the lun context may
have an "option" section (note: it's singular).  The YACC code for parsing =
the
traditional config file also expects "option" (singular again).  But the UCL
parsing code expects "options" (plural).  Curiously, the man page _does_ use
"options" in the example UCL file, though it doesn't mention that spelling =
in
the text.
I think it best if both traditional and UCL mode use the same spelling.  And
since I'm guessing that traditional users still outnumber UCL users, we sho=
uld
standardize on "option".

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279683-227>