Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:59:51 -0700 From: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: "Aryeh Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is difference between /etc/rc called programs and ones called after login prompt shows up Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0808231959i46027bd5xce2c142a21dcd940@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bef9a7920808231902w190dbdffjb1068901e513625d@mail.gmail.com> References: <bef9a7920808230334p4b509e18t1b8a84e9eb7c98b5@mail.gmail.com> <20080823153354.2ed632d4@peedub.jennejohn.org> <bef9a7920808231338s79c78f14w1b8b65f31ffc6d33@mail.gmail.com> <20080823231349.5941d9f3@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080824003920.34f6bf51@gumby.homeunix.com.> <bef9a7920808231902w190dbdffjb1068901e513625d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:39 PM, RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:13:49 +0100 >> RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:38:13 -0400 >>> "Aryeh Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > c) See a additionally to prove all the above here is my /etc/rc (the >>> > last 2 lines where added just to prove the point): >>> > >>> > #!/bin/sh >>> > >>> > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin >>> > >>> > swapon -a >>> > fsck -p >>> > ... >>> > fuse: failed to exec mount program: No such file or directory >>> > >>> > Thus it is clear that the *ONLY* difference between the /etc/rc >>> > calls and the post getty calls is when they are made. >>> >>> There's another difference: your /etc/rc script doesn't export PATH. >> >> That does seem to be the answer. >> >> I was curious as to why it only fails on ntfs, so I had a look >> at the source. It seems that mount and fsck find mount_* and fsck_* >> through a hard-coded path of "/rescue:/sbin:/usr/sbin", but >> mount_ntfs-3g then additionally has to find mount_fusefs through the >> environment path. >> >> Perhaps sysutils/fusefs-libs should be patched to make the whole thing >> more self-consistent. Isn't the typical use-case for fuse-based FS'es to be executed in userland though by non-root users? -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0808231959i46027bd5xce2c142a21dcd940>