Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:04:34 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.compat.mk Message-ID: <20050228230434.GA62151@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050228223115.GB62844@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502280923.j1S9NcKE004088@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050228093414.GA74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228093622.GB74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228182618.GB56766@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228214233.GA6011@ip.net.ua> <20050228223115.GB62844@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:31:15PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:42:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > If you are just hiding the warning, can you explain your reasoning,
> > as in my opinion it just kills the idea of "deprecation". People
> > will continue to use it, without letting us remove it safely later.
>=20
> 1. We don't deprecate it. There is no reason to. We keep other "ugly"
> stuff for even more trival reasons.
> 2. The warnings give faults postivies to build issues.
>=20
*Shrug*
1. My plan on deprecating them in 7.0-RELEASE was OK'ed by core@.
For now (RELENG_5 and RELENG_6), old spellings are supported,
and deprecation warning is issued.
2. What makes NOCLEAN so special, what about other knobs?
Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFCI6OCqRfpzJluFF4RAkgXAJ9HJJkhrk9pdVxPjdcZ4DdHdvbaAgCeJT1Y
Z45FjOsvSpF3ynTKaHFDCN8=
=lLFn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050228230434.GA62151>