Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:24:23 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        scottl@freebsd.org
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach
Message-ID:  <20030814.232423.54451456.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F3C6D22.8050305@freebsd.org>
References:  <XFMail.20030814110100.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030814.223212.102654511.imp@bsdimp.com> <3F3C6D22.8050305@freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

In message: <3F3C6D22.8050305@freebsd.org>
            Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> writes:
: I can tell you first hand that this is painful.  However, in the case of
: PAE, it's somewhat neccessary since certain fundamental types change
: size.  I can envision solutions for this, but I'm not sure if they are
: less painful than just dealing with multiple module builds.

Personally I think that pae should be its own port, much like pc98 is
its own port, although much smaller in scope.  It has a few,
fundamental differences from the "stock" i386 port.  Since the data
type sizes are different with PAE there's no way around that.

Warner


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030814.232423.54451456.imp>