Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:10:00 +0700 From: Alexey Rubtsov <arubtsov@parallels.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fw: Practices for naming packages compiled from ports. Message-ID: <20080429091000.43abb7b1@rubtsov.plesk.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Sorry to previous spam. I'm trying to compile package from port systitis/pecl-fileinfo and was some saddened. This package consists depend to php, but name of compiled package was pecl-fileinfo for either php version. In answer to my bug to this problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123063 I get that so names for packages "it's not a bug, it's common practice". I didn't understand this practice. Why i can't to compile the same package with several names by included dependencies into package. In the same time i see many php extensions with php4- or php5- prefix into package name which detected by php version installed into system. The same problem is exists for apache too. I can't to compile php package for various apache versions but with different package names. I want to have possibility to create myself package repository with both php and apache versions. -- Alexey Rubtsov E-mail: arubtsov@parallels.com WebSite: http://www.parallels.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080429091000.43abb7b1>