Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:29:34 +0300 (MSK) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903121828280.38427-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990311134107.4815B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > it. I may get a chance to look at it again more seriously in the near > future. It also raises the issue as to whether it wouldn't be better to > reengineer the setuid programs so they aren't setuid :-). You mean capabilities and ACLs? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903121828280.38427-100000>