Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:26:10 -0700 From: Edward M <eam1edward@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? Message-ID: <4FD11C72.6000708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7S8ae4SkJyETAM3kuxuK9udXt%2BD%2BANPs9rvxdqh_h0e2Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120606182153.3cc2ee07.freebsd@edvax.de> <d0d8129924f70fbd791ef9e3fb088e9b@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> <CAHieY7S8ae4SkJyETAM3kuxuK9udXt%2BD%2BANPs9rvxdqh_h0e2Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/06/2012 01:35 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > But this is more to do with the BIOS than with Intel as such. Wasn't > there a FreeBIOS, later LinuxBIOS, now coreboot I believe..? > So replacing the BIOS entirely wouldn't suffice to override all this nonsense? > _______________________________________________ anybody will be free to disable secure boot in x86 systems and run any OS, so this is not really a big deal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD11C72.6000708>