Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:26:10 -0700
From:      Edward M <eam1edward@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?
Message-ID:  <4FD11C72.6000708@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7S8ae4SkJyETAM3kuxuK9udXt%2BD%2BANPs9rvxdqh_h0e2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20120606182153.3cc2ee07.freebsd@edvax.de> <d0d8129924f70fbd791ef9e3fb088e9b@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> <CAHieY7S8ae4SkJyETAM3kuxuK9udXt%2BD%2BANPs9rvxdqh_h0e2Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/06/2012 01:35 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> But this is more to do with the BIOS than with Intel as such. Wasn't
> there a FreeBIOS, later LinuxBIOS, now coreboot I believe..?
> So replacing the BIOS entirely wouldn't suffice to override all this nonsense?
> _______________________________________________
     anybody will be free  to disable secure boot in x86 systems and run 
any OS, so this is not really a big deal.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD11C72.6000708>