Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:14:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r186751 - in head/sys: netinet6 netipsec Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901042213530.67103@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20090104220716.GL14235@hoeg.nl> References: <200901042153.n04LrgkD075147@svn.freebsd.org> <20090104220716.GL14235@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Unlike with struct protosw, several instances of struct ip6protosw >> did not use C99-style sparse structure initialization, so remove >> NULL assignments for now-removed pr_usrreq function pointers. > > Maybe we should convert them to use the C99-style initialisation. This could > prevent similar issues in the future, right? I think Bjoern already has a work-in-progress on this one, but yes, that would be a good idea. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0901042213530.67103>