Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:38:34 +0900 (JST) From: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports Message-ID: <200001081738.CAA16033@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org> References: <vqcaemhdo8x.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
itojun> Do you think you need USE_INET6 (or something like this), to provide itojun> fallback to IPv4-only port? or can we just make them IPv6 ready itojun> without any switches? In some cases, USE_INET6 is necessary because ports-current support both of 3-STABLE and current tree now. For example, in ports/net/zebra, ospf6d and ripngd, which are IPv6 routing daemon modules, are not installed by 'configure' detection on 3-STABLE environment. We need to prepare the difference PLISTs on 3-STABLE and current. It's like the relation between aout and elf in past days. --- Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project / FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001081738.CAA16033>