Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:25:27 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Kirill Ponomarew <krion@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/compat5x Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <431417F7.1030600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200508292315.29137.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200508260521.j7Q5L2hN020122@repoman.freebsd.org> <200508280439.11640.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <43115F75.8060904@FreeBSD.org> <200508292315.29137.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Sunday 28 of August 2005 08:53, Doug Barton wrote: >>On another note, I'd like to cast a vote for adding libm.so.2 to the set. I >>have a 5.x binary from a third party that was apparently compiled on >>5.0-RELEASE that I'm trying to get working on -current, and I need that >>library, so I assume others will too. > > > Would it work with compat4x like it's done with math/dislin? If libm.so.2 is > added to compat5x, compat5x and compat4x would conflict - see > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2005-August/070889.html Argh, thanks for pointing this out. I withdraw my request. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?431417F7.1030600>