Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:42:22 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breaking old compilation paths Message-ID: <20020505124222.GT66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <20020504181205.GG66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20020504181205.GG66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20020504 20:15], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai (asmodai@wxs.nl) wrote: >It is only here that warnings are treated as errors. >I am thinking something in the upgrade path is not 100% thought out, trying >to see what exactly, but my focus has been way more on STABLE than CURRENT, >so some more exposed experience gladly received. Of course, the entire build complains due to WARNS being raised above 0 and NO_WERROR has not been defined. The only reference I can find in UPDATING is: 20020225: Warnings are now errors in the kernel. Unless you are a developer, you should add -DNO_WERROR to your make line. I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving from older versions to newer versions of CURRENT. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/ I am, I was, and I will be... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020505124222.GT66061>