Date: 03 Apr 2002 21:07:54 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, jhb@FreeBSD.org, winter@jurai.net, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, pst@pst.org, imp@village.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sysinstall install.c installUpgrade Message-ID: <xzpwuvo38j9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <28699.1017857530@winston.freebsd.org> References: <28699.1017857530@winston.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org> writes: > I would also argue that package size is of the highest priority - > that's patently untrue. What's the highest priority in packaging > formats is providing enough power and mechanism to make the package > installation experience a lot more robust and user-friendly. Disks > are getting so cheap and so large (in even the most humble user > configurations) that I'd probably put package size _last_. Package size determines how many packages we can stuff on the CDs. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwuvo38j9.fsf>