Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:53:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/528 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960411015205.2528B-100000@freebsd.ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199604110542.PAA29754@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Apr 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > > I guess that putting a TTYHOG/PTYHOG in sys/tty.h wouldn't be > >acceptable to circumvent this problem? I don't assume that pty's > >generate the error that it is we are trying to fix, so seperating the > ^don't > >*HOG defines would make sense, no? > > The limit should be in the tty struct (and vary with the line speed). Ah, that makes sense... > tty.c doesn't know the difference between a pty and a tty, so it has > no way of selection between TTYHOG and PTYHOG. > Actually, my idea was more that in sio.c, you would use the TTYHOG define, and when you were dealing with pty drivers, you would use PTYHOG, but both would be defined (and therefore seperately modified) in tty.h Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.92.960411015205.2528B-100000>