Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:11:22 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: feld@feld.me Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: accepting rtadv broken on 9-STABLE, re driver? Message-ID: <20120107.211122.2051906580877809031.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <op.v7ogp01w34t2sn@tech304> <4F079BFC.6040405@FreeBSD.org> References: <op.v7oc6cmg34t2sn@tech304> <CAE-mSOL3PEvxFwfyEs7V5tx689vQJpAhjyPJPSHh-axXU-QAmg@mail.gmail.com> <op.v7ogp01w34t2sn@tech304>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__7_21_11_22_2012_218)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> wrote in <op.v7ogp01w34t2sn@tech304>: fe> I figured I would end up putting that in rc.conf as a temporary fix, fe> but maybe that's just the long term solution. It seems so odd to me fe> that the sysctl change doesn't automatically cause the ACCEPT_RTADV fe> option to show up for re0, but it does for vboxnet0. Perhaps there fe> should be a cleaner way to do this in rc.conf like how we do fe> ifconfig_re0="DHCP" ? Is it correct that ACCEPT_RTADV option was enabled on the vboxnet0 and not on re0, even after setting net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to 1 at boot time and ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES"? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__7_21_11_22_2012_218)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8INmoACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3zIgCgpbDOOjaJ31KiKSS1X+9X40xD OYMAoMRrnp0V//pSiV03B3aR2OyN34fj =lYQp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__7_21_11_22_2012_218)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120107.211122.2051906580877809031.hrs>