Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      12 Mar 2011 20:37:48 -0500
From:      "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, traveling08@cox.net
Subject:   Re: Unable to umount
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103122037370.53125@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <4d7c1b21.XSmUAJIfbvZ%2Bnhis%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <20110312172959.65728.qmail@joyce.lan> <4d7c1b21.XSmUAJIfbvZ%2Bnhis%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>
>> ... The problem is likely that HAL or one of its friends helpfully
>> has the device open just in case you might want to ask questions
>> about it.
>
> I that case, shouldn't lsof(8) have reported something?

Yes.  It always did for me.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1103122037370.53125>