Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:05:51 -0500
From:      Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, bhlewis@wossname.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?
Message-ID:  <20020812140551.GC45699@luke.immure.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020812213155.O24183-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <200208111333.aa34638@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20020812213155.O24183-100000@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:16:56PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:

 [snip]

> 
> I just saw a reply from the original (?) author of the PR.  Apparently
> dump gets killed by amanda.  Does amanda actually kill its children
> enough to matter?

>From my experience/use with amanda I know that it _always_ kills the
dumps that it starts when doing its estimates at the beginning (often
several per file system, one for each dump level it's interested in). I
don't think it deliberately kills the dumps when actually dumping the
data. :-)

 [snip]

Bob

-- 
Bob Willcox            We seem to have forgotten the simple truth that
bob@vieo.com           reason is never perfect. Only non-sense attains
Austin, TX             perfection.      -- Poul Henningsen [1894-1967]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020812140551.GC45699>