Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:22:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Joseph Scott <joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/nbtscan Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/net/nbtscan/files patch-configure patch-configure_in Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108230818420.79810-100000@pebkac.owp.csus.edu> In-Reply-To: <200108230730.f7N7Ujw08617@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: # kris 2001/08/23 00:30:45 PDT # # Modified files: # net Makefile # Added files: # net/nbtscan Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr # pkg-plist # net/nbtscan/files patch-configure patch-configure_in # Log: # Add nbtscan 1.0.2, a tool for scanning for NetBIOS name information. # # Obtained from: OpenBSD Do all three of these ports: net/nat net/nbtscan security/nbaudit do the same exact thing then? I thought at one point the older ones were going to be removed because they were no longer being developed. If nbtscan is the one we keep, might security be a better place for it (along with nmap and friends) than net? -Joseph To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108230818420.79810-100000>