Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:07:17 -0800
From:      Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com>
To:        <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Subject:   Re: CURRENT October images do not create a bootable install
Message-ID:  <8796e4c2dedffbdd8502c07bab861c9a@udns.ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <353EF18E-0421-4687-B64B-C5D5DBA69A30@me.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:09:12 +0200 Toomas Soome tsoome@me.com said

> > On 7. Nov 2019, at 19:37, Chris.H <chris.h@ultimatedns.net> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:28:16 +0200 Toomas Soome tsoome@me.com said
> > 
> >> > On 7. Nov 2019, at 17:23, Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:49:52 +0100 gljennjohn@gmail.com said
> >> >> I chose GPT.
> >> > > Maybe whoever wrote the EFI/BIOS code in your machine went all-in on
> >> > "Legacy", and it only handles MBR disks (or disks < 2.2TB)?
> >> > After all, it seems like "not booting" would be a standards-compliant
> >> > way for a classic BIOS to handle a GPT disk.
> >> > if your system is not booting from GPT disk, it means it is not standards
> >> compliant.
> > Interesting. So then RELENG-12 is not "Standards" compliant. While 13-CURRENT
> > is?
> 
> 
> Can not tell if you do not provide actual information, we can not really tell
> too much. However, based on the partition tables below, I can tell a bit.
> 
> Those disks are using GPT, there is EFI partition, which does suggest UEFI
> boot and not BIOS boot. There is no freebsd-boot partition, meaning the
> standard pmbr boot block does not work (if installed) — pmbr does search
> for freebsd-boot and will load its content and jumps on it. Without seeing
> your sector 0, I can not tell what code is there (if any), and based on
> partitions on that system, it is possible the BIOS boot is not installed at
> all. In a similar way, without seeing EFI partition content, we can not tell
> if UEFI boot is actually installed - EFI partition should have FAT file
> system with specific directory tree.
> 
> To make things better, the exact description would be helpful, so the devs
> taking care of installer could review the information and make fixes.

Right. Sorry. I forgot you had asked for the output of dd(1).

I've done so, and will send you the output directly (off list).

Thank you!
> 
> rgds,
> toomas
> 
> 
[snip]

--Chris





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8796e4c2dedffbdd8502c07bab861c9a>