Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Dec 2024 01:00:08 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 275049] Network resource control limit not mentioned in rctl.8
Message-ID:  <bug-275049-227-SOZgWiRmr4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-275049-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-275049-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275049

Jason W. Bacon <jwb@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jwb@freebsd.org

--- Comment #2 from Jason W. Bacon <jwb@freebsd.org> ---
One thing that certainly should be mentioned under SEE ALSO is
rctl_add_rule(2)and friends.=20=20

Upon reading rctl(8) and seeing no mention of it, I couldn't believe that t=
he
API would not be exposed, so I ran

    find /usr/src/ -name '*rctl*'

This revealed /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/rctl_add_rule.2.

The man page is pretty minimal and could probably be fleshed out in general=
.=20
I'll have more to say once I've had time to play with it.

If the RSS limits work as I hope, this tool is a godsend for enforcing job
parameters on HPC clusters.  I plan to incorporate it into my new resource
manager, LPJS.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275049-227-SOZgWiRmr4>