Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 02:59:03 +0000 From: John Howie <john@thehowies.com> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Socket bound to 0.0.0.0 never receives broadcasts with non-zero IP source address Message-ID: <D14B6292.3D63C%john@thehowies.com> In-Reply-To: <5525D939.4030506@rawbw.com> References: <55248957.60109@rawbw.com> <878ue2n6lu.fsf@corbe.net> <55259BC7.6040502@rawbw.com> <D14B21F3.3D5E8%john@thehowies.com> <5525AEE4.3030400@rawbw.com> <D14B2C1E.3D605%john@thehowies.com> <5525D939.4030506@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Yuri, No need to apologize! Sometimes it takes a dispassionate person to review the problem to help you find the solution. You found it, not me. I just helped you get there‘¦ Still at 35000‘― (literally), trying to get to where I am going! Regards, John On 4/8/15, 9:43 PM, "Yuri" <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: >On 04/08/2015 16:07, John Howie wrote: >> Have you tried using a static IP address for the host and VM, and >> disabling DHCP? The DHCP client will bind to and use 0.0.0.0 to get an >>IP >> address. The SO_REUSEADDR rule is that every tuple (proto, src ip, src >> port, dst ip, dst prt) must be unique. I am wondering if that is where >> your problem lies. There might be something that is shortcutting the >> uniqueness of the tuple and just focusing on IP addresses. I would >> validate that for you but I am at 35000©φ right now... >> > >Hi John, > >I apologize, I actually did have ipfw rules set, and ipfw is the culprit. > >Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D14B6292.3D63C%john>