Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:51:30 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem Message-ID: <16281.22674.121623.574110@emerger.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <3F975B45.6010504@freebsd.org> References: <20031023041544.068CD2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <3F975B45.6010504@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ add compatability hacks to libm ] > > We tried this at usenix, but it still didn't work. Obviously there is more > > going on. > > > > Before anybody goes and bumps libraries etc, it would be useful to know if > > running a statically linked jvm will work on -current. > > This sounds like a good plan, though it should be noted that statically > linking the jvm executable will reder it useless since it won't be able > to dl_open any of the essential JNI modules. Not just the JNI modules, but basically *all* the modules are dl_opened, so a staticially linked modern JVM can't realistically be created. The last time we were able to create a static JVM was JDK1.1. I spent many weeks attempting to create one for 1.2, and finally gave up. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16281.22674.121623.574110>