Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:11:10 -0700
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
Cc:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r436576 - in head/emulators/wine-devel: . files
Message-ID:  <20170322051110.GC23308@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201703220509.v2M59ZxR029779@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <glebius@FreeBSD.org> <20170322041508.GA23308@FreeBSD.org> <201703220509.v2M59ZxR029779@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:09:35PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
C> In message <20170322041508.GA23308@FreeBSD.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
C> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:35:39PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
C> > G> > But without the bump I can't enforce rebuild for FreeBSD 12 users, can I
C> > ?
C> > G> 
C> > G> Well, it did not build for FreeBSD 12 users without your patch, or 
C> > G> did I misunderstand?
C> > 
C> > The version built earlier won't work properly on newer head, so we
C> > want users to rebuild. I thought bumping PORTREVISION is the right
C> > thing to do.
C> 
C> Generally, if it's broken and the commit fixes the build, no PORTREVISION 
C> bump is needed.
C> 
C> If the ABI in base changes, then a PORTREVISION bump is also required.

Thanks for explanation. The latter is the case (ABI changed), so bump
was useful.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170322051110.GC23308>