Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:21:05 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 277326] FreeBSD guest on QEMU with Hyper-V enlightenment on is no longer able to detect Hyper-V devices
Message-ID:  <bug-277326-27103-KSjVyKOwC2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-277326-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-277326-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277326

--- Comment #4 from Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 from comment #3)
> Hm, I guess I'm a bit confused.
While debugging PR 274810, I see the behavior, that FreeBSD guests report
HyperV rather than KVM when Hyper-V enlightenment is enabled.

> If the hypervisor is KVM, shouldn't it be detected as KVM rather than Hyp=
erV?
I think KVM should be reported. But it seems everything goes right even Hyp=
erV
is reported.

> What's the benefit of using the HyperV enlightenments when running on QEM=
U/KVM?
I think Microsoft people are more familiar with that. When debugging PR 274=
810
I read briefly the design of Hyper-V virtual devices. I think the design is
pretty clear and performant.

I see lots of comparing of vm_guest in hyperv device drivers. I guess they
should be removed to correctly probe Hyper-V devices, to correctly support
Hyper-V enlightenment feature.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277326-27103-KSjVyKOwC2>