Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 06:21:05 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: sh@planetquake.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge config in /etc/rc (patch) Message-ID: <20030506.062105.70173875.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <011901c31390$7aef5730$0300000a@antalus> References: <011901c31390$7aef5730$0300000a@antalus>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I think I like this syntax and have only one comment. This seems to match up with ifconfig's aliases fairly well. However, I think that the model here might be better served by the routes: bridge_names="a b c" bridge_a="fxp1 rl0" bridge_b="dc1 fxp0" bridge_c="rl1 dc0" I'd stick to spaces only, to match the sysctl. I don't think that it goes too far. This doesn't really change the number of knobs that a normal user has to deal with, but does allow some of the more advanced functions to be more easily accessed. Warnerhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506.062105.70173875.imp>