Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:15:36 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet
Message-ID:  <20030930171535.GA31908@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <8475.1064905854@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <200309301045.15776.vjardin@wanadoo.fr> <8475.1064905854@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <200309301045.15776.vjardin@wanadoo.fr>, Vincent Jardin writes:
> >Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 03:03, Brooks Davis a =E9crit :
> >> [Previously posted to -net in another form.]
> >>
> >> I propose to add an if_dev member to struct ifnet.  It would be of type
> >> device_t and be defined to point to the device for the interface or NU=
LL
> >> if there is no device (or if there was not an easy way to get access to
> >> one).
> >>
> >> This change would codify the the relationship between an interface and
> >> the underlying physical device.  It also would get rid of the existing
> >> abuses of if_name to look up the driver associated with an interface
> >> and simplify a number of messy cases in the conversion from if_unit and
> >> if_name to if_xname.
> >>
> >> Does this seem like a reasonable thing to do?
> >
> >Yes, if it helps to remove if_name/if_unit, it is a thing to do. Moreove=
r it=20
> >sounds a good idea to have the if_dev field into the ifnet structure.
>=20
> Somebody please explain how this would work for non-hardware
> interfaces like if_loop, if_tun, if_tap etc ?

if_dev would be NULL when a device_t was not available.  Code which used
this feature would be required to either check that if_dev was non-NULL
before trying to use it or have special knowldege that it only gets
called with struct ifnet instances which have a non-NULL if_dev member.
For instance, driver routines which take a struct ifnet would know that
they are only called on their own ifnet so they could assume they had
filled it in.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ebnzXY6L6fI4GtQRAlveAJ9ZoFSGyyHg317JC6z+Wrgp2K+/2QCdGID2
ttlbZccT/fcmYswywjaqA1o=
=HbMf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030930171535.GA31908>