Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 17:44:14 -0500 From: Andrew Herdman <andrew@why.whine.com> To: Rob Simons <rob@xs1.simplex.nl> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: term server Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970328174002.4322D-100000@why> In-Reply-To: <199703270841.JAA01938@xs1.simplex.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The Cisco AS5200 is an excellent product, performs much better than the Ascend Max's and has access to any routing protocol (RIP, RIPv2, OSPF, BGP, IGRP, EIGRP, ISIS). Runs standard Cisco IOS and is a dream to work with. One problem with them is their RADIUS support is kind of poor, TACACS works well thou and they are continuing to develop RADIUS. It does both ISDN and Analog when you install modems in it. (Get the managed modems, not the cheap ones). Andrew On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Rob Simons wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking into combined ISDN/analog access solutions and wonder > what the general opinion is on the matter. > I've heard good things about the Ascend MAX 4000 as well as about > the Livingston Portmaster solutions. > > Which of these is considered to be the best choice for an ISP, and > what do I need to provide ISDN/analog access to my (mainly FreeBSD) > network ? (we currently use modems directly on one FreeBSD machine, > and a sepparate ISDN access router from Gandalf) > > You can email me directly, and I will post the outcome back to the > list. > > - Rob. > > /*--------------------------------------------------------------*\ > /* Rob Simons | rob@simplex.nl *\ > /* ------------ | ------------- | -------- | ------- *\ > /* Novell Netware System Operator | UNIX system operator *\ > /*--------------------------------------------------------------*\ >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970328174002.4322D-100000>