Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:16:51 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which MySQL version best to use and with/without linux threads? Message-ID: <200510030916.52936.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <20051001161716.GB67272@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <ED4C536E-48C1-11D9-B2C4-000A2791B6EC@illusionart.com> <433E9DD1.90900@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20051001161716.GB67272@xor.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On October 1, 2005 09:17 am, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 04:31:45PM +0200, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > > Freddie Cash wrote: > > >Scott Long and Kris Kenneway ran various benchmarks back in the > > > early 5.x days comparing MySQL 4 compiled with LinuxThreads, > > > libc_r, libkse (the default threading library on 5.x and 6.x), > > > and libthr. In almost all cases, libkse was just as faster or > > > faster than LinuxThreads. > > Do you have a reference? I couldn't reproduce this conclusion. > I suspect it was Robert Watson, not me (or my strangely-named cousin I know I read a nice long e-mail on this subject back in the 5.2.1 -> 5.3 days. But now I can't find the message in my message store or in archives. I'll keep searching though. I know a bunch of benchmarks were done with MySQL and libc_r, libthr, libkse, and LinuxThreads. -- Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fcash-ml@sd73.bc.cahome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510030916.52936.fcash-ml>