Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:41:41 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUTYPE and friends, from 'make.conf' benchmark Message-ID: <20111207.164141.027.1@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <CAJcQMWeE-PBk1aGFQ=o-Vf=_Z_AK9NL4Eo-irpVP692VX=saFQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111205.171654.020.1@DOMY-PC> <CAGH67wTjGyhWAMYsCtzp8X7nN=yswOGntO=46AmT7yxymHSQ%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20111206.170342.731.2@DOMY-PC> <CAF6rxgmbJowjQkY6_t9y_X12S42j9_gb5CyART1tFGUcFHb42w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJcQMWeE-PBk1aGFQ=o-Vf=_Z_AK9NL4Eo-irpVP692VX=saFQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Time is SAME as with generic binaries, but score is just a 1.2 higher, > which is too small to be relevant. > > What do you think about this? > > > > I think this is why most people don't bother with setting CPUTYPE ;) > > Chris > DUH! Why you didn't told me that right away. instead making me into "ALL THIS"! Yes, yes, very funy! I'll remember this! :P > As usual, it very well *may* be true, but please use ministat(1) to > confirm. This requires more than one test. I'm not trying to be > difficult - but statistics and benchmarking is non-trivial. > > -- > Eitan Adler I understand and have read your link about statistics and benchmarking ... Yes, I agree. It is science for itself. I've never heard for ministat(1) and will throw an eye on: > A few other good suggestions: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice > > - Max > I would like to ask a few questions, regarding setting up ENVIROMENT for benchmarking, regardless of what will be benched! That is, point where benchmarking hasn't even started! I see it should be SUM (single user mode), with enabled, only essential "things" Should it be a regular or MD ROOT based SUM (FreeBSD running in RAM) Domagoj Smolčić
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111207.164141.027.1>