Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 08:26:36 +0200 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org> To: Thierry Thomas <thierry@freebsd.org> Cc: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r369447 - head/math/py-numpy Message-ID: <CAALwa8kQOo8oyUdFMDtoS251yxNR8YrGtN22uqSZh6WaY8_YUg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20141001211730.GL16571@graf.pompo.net> References: <98696AA7-E23D-46BF-854C-DAAB0FEAE9CC@FreeBSD.org> <20140929174352.GH22824@graf.pompo.net> <20140929220609.GK22824@graf.pompo.net> <6D4AA066-D0FE-4F86-9519-4235A4B8D4B8@FreeBSD.org> <20140930094610.Horde.DUABEBfOMwkJwRR-18ZKxw1@graf.pompo.net> <794D8C26-FC05-4417-A16C-47B3156285F2@FreeBSD.org> <20140930105901.Horde.8NnDt4jYnDKAQm8WBYG8sg2@graf.pompo.net> <CAALwa8=Cw_qU5B5qz0_AJM4i7tQ%2BSE8=7B69SAD57u_fBt2HWg@mail.gmail.com> <20141001191330.GI16571@graf.pompo.net> <CAALwa8k4OefC4FH6=CMgfHnJuBRYmC6eJoBdxwop7chp5EKhpw@mail.gmail.com> <20141001211730.GL16571@graf.pompo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Thierry Thomas <thierry@freebsd.org> wrote= : > Le mer 1 oct 14 =C3=A0 22:53:45 +0200, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.o= rg> > =C3=A9crivait : > >> And those 2: >> >> http://package20.nyi.freebsd.org/data/91amd64-default-baseline/369680/lo= gs/errors/wspr-3.00.r2511_8.log >> http://package20.nyi.freebsd.org/data/91amd64-default-baseline/369680/lo= gs/errors/wsjt-9.1.r2511_5.log >> >> Are you sure it's no a bug in numpy? >> Manually adding -shared to all those ports doesn't look too right. > > I'm wondering too... This is rather strange, and I cannot explain why > this failure appears now. > > For sure numpy was broken before my patch: it was impossible to use it > without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the libfortran directory. But I don't > understand how it could be related to this missing '-shared'. > > In the meantime we also upgraded Gcc from 4.7 to 4.8, and this produces > also new failures, e.g. with cad/kicad: it was OK with 4.7 but does not > compile anymore with 4.8. Hi, The failures are not related to the gcc 4.7 -> gcc 4.8 switch (I did the exp-run) Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAALwa8kQOo8oyUdFMDtoS251yxNR8YrGtN22uqSZh6WaY8_YUg>