Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:36:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247542] math/lapack: upgrade to 3.9.0 with math/blas + math/xlapack + math/cblas Message-ID: <bug-247542-37611-7QbhtDGBhU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-247542-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-247542-37611@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247542 --- Comment #6 from John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> --- (In reply to Thierry Thomas from comment #5) Did you perhaps intend to delete the '.include <bsd.port.options.mk>' line? The latest patch adds a second one. =============== 'make patch' in math/lapack is failing. I think you just forgot some files/patch* deletions that were in the first patch. Some additions were omitted in the new patch, too (e.g., static.mk). =================== The manpages.tgz file now no longer has a version tag. If one keeps old distfiles around (I do), that can cause a conflict on an update. Maybe consider DIST_SUBDIR=lapack/${PORTVERSION} (qemu does that, for example, and linux-flashplayer)? ================== In static.mk (in the original patch), it references SRC in two places. The post-build replaces 'cd SRC' with 'cd xxx/SRC', but does not replace SRC in the RANLIB line. So ranlib is failing as follows when, for instance, building math/blas: ranlib: 'SRC/libblas.a': No such file Maybe just remove 'cd ' in the sed lines in post-build so the sed replaces both instances of SRC? I don't understand why the earlier exp-run was not failing here. ================= -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247542-37611-7QbhtDGBhU>