Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 03:09:37 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Subject: RE: cu(1) (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist) Message-ID: <XFMail.011026030937.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200110260851.f9Q8pBY43357@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26-Oct-01 Mark Murray wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 16:13:11 -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: >> >> > Not sure about other dirs with the same damage (0755) by recent commit. >> >> They are uucp family dirs. Probably we don't need to keep them all, only >> needed by 'cu'. > > If we are keeping uucp junk around for cu(1), why is cu(1) not a port? > Alternatively, what are the desirable features of cu(1) that tip(1) really > needs to be able to do? I can just type 'cu -l /dev/cuaa0 -s 115200' w/o needing to setup an entry in /etc/remote. i.e., laziness. :) -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011026030937.jhb>