Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:30:45 +1000 (EST) From: Andy Farkas <andyf@speednet.com.au> To: Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster feature suggestion... Message-ID: <20031222132538.N97523@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3FE65CFF.2000102@mindspring.com> References: <20031221084531.GB31516@cactus.homeunix.org> <20031221105925.GA1713@utgard.lodz.mm.pl> <1072018131.715.10.camel@localhost> <3FE5B804.6000707@ispro.net.tr> <20031221154129.GE2228@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3FE65CFF.2000102@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Coleman wrote:
> Well, regardless of what is the official method, it doesn't mean we (as
> developers) need to make life hard for ourselves. There are a couple
> times I would have found such a feature in mergemaster to be useful
> (mainly as a sanity check). It's not a showstopper, just a "nice to have".
I *always* use mergemaster's -v option. It does exactly what I want: tells
me which files currently in /etc that are not part of the new install.
--
:{ andyf@speednet.com.au
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
Speednet Communications
http://www.speednet.com.au/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031222132538.N97523>