Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:29:49 -0500 From: Zach Heilig <zach@gaffaneys.com> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, Zach Heilig <zach@gaffaneys.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ELF style (where to test PORTOBJFORMAT) Message-ID: <19980914232949.A11158@znh.org> In-Reply-To: <199809142116.OAA24203@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 02:16:52PM -0700 References: <19980914085939.A9766@znh.org> <199809142116.OAA24203@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 02:16:52PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Yes, this would be fine. It's generally not recommended to put things > after ".include <bsd.port.mk>", but I think in this case it could be > the only way to get it to work cleanly. One more question... If you have a choice between patching the port Makefile or adding more to the patches/ directory, which is preferable? -- Zach Heilig -- zach@gaffaneys.com A horse without a nose... never wins. (unknown) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980914232949.A11158>