Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 21:18:25 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Huge build times increase after updating from 14.3 to 14.4 [15.0 and main suffer such extra time as well] Message-ID: <e6a0dead-3941-4cda-b119-4059fe1243a2@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <CAA2O=b-MpKL2o4L8vPo3x%2BW3WT0pzrOvMXtcEmqcWQWfuqmOvQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 3/13/26 06:03, Anton Saietskii wrote: > Hi folks, > > Recently, I've been upgrading from releng/14.3 to releng/14.4 and as > usual, the first thing I did after booting into new BE was 'poudriere > bulk' (also, in releng/14.4 jail). For my set of packages, full > rebuild with cold ccache takes about a day, however this time it took > _twice_ as long. . . . > > Also, unjailed 'poudriere options' for my set went up from about 16 to > 22 minutes. > . . . On 3/14/26 04:26, Anton Saietskii wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 3:54 PM Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> wrote: >>. . . > Olivier, thanks a lot for your suggestion, it's indeed exactly the > problem I suffered. I've rebuilt world with > WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES= and 'poudriere options' instantly > went back to 16-17 minutes. Meanwhile I also noted world build time > before and after (with ccache running, but CCACHE_DISABLED=true): >>>> World build completed on Fri Mar 13 22:39:17 EET 2026 >>>> World built in 6202 seconds, ncpu: 8, make -j6 > >>>> World build completed on Sat Mar 14 03:06:36 EET 2026 >>>> World built in 3730 seconds, ncpu: 8, make -j6 15.0 and main port-package builder jails also are not based on WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES= as stands. So, should the (or some) official port-package build server jails for 15.0 and/or main (and, eventually, 14.4) be jails that are based on WITH_LLVM_LINK_STATIC_LIBRARIES= ? Especially ampere2 for its main-arm64-default builds (the most time consuming build context for from-scratch bulk build runs as stands)? At least until the time difference for dynamically link library use has been cut down noticeably? Based on (normal-configuration) builds that started in 2026: (ampere5 had an initial low-memory configuration based build of 150arm64-default starting on Jan-3 that I ignore here.) ampere2: 237+ hrs to build 35496+ port-packages (plus 140+ failures) (main-arm64, 32 CPUs) ampere4/5: 79+ hrs to build 35739+ port-packages (plus 112+ failures) (150arm64-quartererly and 150arm64-default, both amperes having 160 CPUs each) By contrast, 143arm64-* ampere4/5 builds: (so: based on using a toolchain built using LLVM static library linking) ampere4/5: 63+ hrs to build 35740+ port-packages (plus 101+ failures) (143arm64-quartererly and 143arm64-default, both amperes having 160 CPUs each) -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.comhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e6a0dead-3941-4cda-b119-4059fe1243a2>