Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:43:17 -0400 From: Joshua Pincus <joshua.pincus@gmail.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Craig Butler <craig001@lerwick.hopto.org>, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sparc64 for the bin ?? Message-ID: <CAEO4AA6h3i6jfEiNcw1FyjEnKneij9=cnYT%2BSViNRrRGRHoGRw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180710203705.GA11940@lonesome.com> References: <6d8e7041b2a93b6dfc5823b13b27308b5c27f005.camel@lerwick.hopto.org> <20180710202204.GA11015@lonesome.com> <CAEO4AA7YwA0iyv9svKDRYRkLqNuXjvrRsdfqyb-2zn-HYQpxNA@mail.gmail.com> <20180710203705.GA11940@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Is there no way to leave it as an unsupported arch of some kind? If someone wants to use it, they will need to test it accordingly. Dumping it in this way seems short-sighted and unnecessary. JP On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:31:20PM -0400, Joshua Pincus wrote: > > I'm confused. Why remove it at all? What harm is there in keeping the > > arch there? > > The src committers claim that having it slows down their work on other > problems due to the extra test time. > > mcl >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEO4AA6h3i6jfEiNcw1FyjEnKneij9=cnYT%2BSViNRrRGRHoGRw>