Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:22:54 +0200
From:      Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se>
To:        William Palfreman <william@palfreman.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 4.8 or 5.0 ?
Message-ID:  <3EA6859E.8020206@snowfall.se>
In-Reply-To: <20030423131623.Y632@ndhn.yna.cnyserzna.pbz>
References:  <3EA67F9D.4030003@snowfall.se> <20030423131623.Y632@ndhn.yna.cnyserzna.pbz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My reason for installing 5.0 is that we will probably want to upgrade to 
5.1 or maybe 5.2 when they arrive and I think that upgrading 5.0->5.2 is 
easier than 4.8->5.2. ?

/ Stefan

William Palfreman wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Stefan Cars wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>We are installing some new servers in our company and I'm thinking of
>>installing 5.0 on them. What do you people think ? Is that to be too
>>brave ?
>>    
>>
>
>I did that once with Linux, between 2.2.19 and 2.4.2/3.  When my boss
>realised what I had done I nearly got fired.  The experience has made me
>morbidly afraid of doing other peoples beta testing for them in a
>production environment, even if it seems fine in on my workstation and
>on test servers.  I now give it about to 18 months before testing new
>major versions.  Almost the only criteria I use is whether what I am
>doing is so out of date that there is no longer a useful user base,
>performance is worse and bugs are going unfixed.
>
>Do you have any reason to believe 4.8 won't work?
>
>Bill.
>  
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA6859E.8020206>