Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:54:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <200007270554.XAA15587@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com> References: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > What do you folks think about this? I vote #3. It gives us a more secure 'default', but allows people with special configurations to tweak it for their particular 'less secure' environments. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007270554.XAA15587>