Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 11:29:39 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eik@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/portaudit-db/database portaudit.txt portaudit.xlist portaudit.xml Message-ID: <20040815162939.GB3559@lum.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <200408131648.i7DGmC0r095160@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200408131648.i7DGmC0r095160@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:48:12PM +0000, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> eik 2004-08-13 16:48:12 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> security/portaudit-db/database portaudit.txt portaudit.xlist
> portaudit.xml
> Log:
> fix some vuxml duplicates, add sympa unauthorized list creation
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.88 +2 -8 ports/security/portaudit-db/database/portaudit.txt
> 1.3 +16 -1 ports/security/portaudit-db/database/portaudit.xlist
> 1.8 +665 -2 ports/security/portaudit-db/database/portaudit.xml
^^^^
Hi Oliver,
The commit message seems to be incomplete. The 670% increase in
portaudit.xml seems to be largely a number of entries that are also in
ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml, although the text and references seem to
be rewritten in most (all?) cases and different UUIDs have been
assigned.
I'm not sure what portaudit.xml is for, but it seems a bit confusing to
have some issues described differently in two different locations. Maybe
you could clue me in as to what is going on? Seems like we need to
normalize this data.
Cheers,
--
Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio
nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040815162939.GB3559>