Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:23:43 -0700 From: "Walter Miller" <wmiller@mediaone.net> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Apache or AOLServer? Message-ID: <000c01c0c856$3dd16690$1502290a@wmiller2K>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Any chance FreeBSD would use AOLServer for their website now that it's open sourced? It seems like AOLServer would be a better fit for FreeBSD than Apache based on the supposed performance and multi-threaded lead it has (and has had for quite a while) over Apache. I'm actually trying to decide for myself which one to go for although I'm leaning towards AOLServer but maybe you guys have some good reasons why Apache is the way to go. [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.3103.1000" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Any chance FreeBSD would use AOLServer for their website now that it's open sourced? It seems like AOLServer would be a better fit for FreeBSD than Apache based on the supposed performance and multi-threaded lead it has (and has had for quite a while) over Apache. I'm actually trying to decide for myself which one to go for although I'm leaning towards AOLServer but maybe you guys have some good reasons why Apache is the way to go.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000c01c0c856$3dd16690$1502290a>