Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 09:17:08 -0700 From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) To: Paul Richards <paul@isl.cf.ac.uk> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), davidg@Root.COM, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shared library versioning Message-ID: <199503271617.JAA02055@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199503271335.OAA10199@isl.cf.ac.uk> References: <199503271324.XAA19834@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199503271335.OAA10199@isl.cf.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >> .. > > >> unless you have some other reason to bump the libc major number. > > >> > > > > >Jordan's just added new hash code..... > > > > There is no problem for new interfaces, except possibly from namespace > > pollution. > > How do we deal witht the problem of binaries that use the new interface > being run on older systems with the old library? Are we bumping the minor > number, does the linker do anything about this? We *should* be bumping the minor number. If no-one gets to it (freefall appears to be down now), I'll try and get to it. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503271617.JAA02055>