Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 22:11:21 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml features.sgml www/en/events/2002 bsdcon-devsummit.sgml www/en/news press-rel-5.sgml www/en/news/status report-july-2001.xml www/en/projects libh.sgml projects.sgml www/en/releases/2.0 install.sgml notes.sgml ... Message-ID: <200205160511.g4G5BLdv059184@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <200205160150.g4G1oIw49248@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200205160150.g4G1oIw49248@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > en/releases/4.4R relnotes-alpha.html > en/releases/5.0R/DP1 installation-alpha.html > installation-i386.html > installation-sparc64.html > relnotes-alpha.html relnotes-i386.html > relnotes-sparc64.html > Log: > consistancy again s/file system/filesystem/g Just for the record, these were generated files. After your changes, they no longer reflect exactly the HTML output one would get from building the release documentation from 4.4-RELEASE and 5.0-DP1. It's probably fine to leave your changes in (since they're very small), but I never intended people to go around editing the generated release documentation in the www/ tree. I'd prefer it if, in the future, people *don't* do this. (The contents of the DocBook files that generated the HTML are, however, fair game, and I strongly support the idea of using consistent terminology in our documentation.) Thanks! Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205160511.g4G5BLdv059184>