Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:47:17 -0500 From: "John W. O'Brien" <john@saltant.com> To: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: default to concurrent Message-ID: <9de8e191-6b5d-5b89-5c1f-ea9a60849b8d@saltant.com> In-Reply-To: <170c35c9-eb37-92b7-3224-54f451f1e21c@FreeBSD.org> References: <b331f7bb-f258-e157-45bb-20cec74b54f0@saltant.com> <170c35c9-eb37-92b7-3224-54f451f1e21c@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --EbW9baT5kEiXqNDSImDvADa3buKBPHq69 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d6NIHS1s8JVTsKgpCgd5axWPssM4MNXdA"; protected-headers="v1" From: "John W. O'Brien" <john@saltant.com> To: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-python@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9de8e191-6b5d-5b89-5c1f-ea9a60849b8d@saltant.com> Subject: Re: Proposal: default to concurrent References: <b331f7bb-f258-e157-45bb-20cec74b54f0@saltant.com> <170c35c9-eb37-92b7-3224-54f451f1e21c@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <170c35c9-eb37-92b7-3224-54f451f1e21c@FreeBSD.org> --d6NIHS1s8JVTsKgpCgd5axWPssM4MNXdA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nikolai, On 1/29/17 23:18, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > I think the biggest controversy is that binary names are suffixed, whic= h > may not be what upstream projects like and/or document. > It may be confusing to users as well. >=20 > If we can get rid of the suffix for PYTHON_CONCURRENT_INSTALL for > whichever version is PYTHON_DEFAULT, it should be a net positive to > treat it the same way we did USE_GCC in the past (enable > PYTHON_NO_CONCURRENT or something and remove it on per-port basis once > fixed). The way you describe it makes me think I'm missing something. The way concurrent works right now, the default version of python gets a script with no suffix, so there's no suffix to get rid of. Are there cases where the presence of suffixed binaries conflicts with upstream and/or causes confusion to users, provided that binaries (or at least symlinks to them) are also present? -J --d6NIHS1s8JVTsKgpCgd5axWPssM4MNXdA-- --EbW9baT5kEiXqNDSImDvADa3buKBPHq69 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYkKN5AAoJEGEAJpqmdExHF68P/jfhFnhejBKTlohVfn+cNyhL 5G4LufHP8KcpUQdXOZwd3Obe2iHr+qAGdR51s65wXJiZd4Ws1ztLB3JypajT1pVK pT48aFToL85mPCyR8kiricqH8lhmPf/uYuq624zyhBCoFjMlYWr5MR7ySHbf7nrm YDbjsHneMyC3hzYtvNlTAC25tE4dBLSj3hnGjmgnqPgDelQvR/DxdLBdYXsE4KP5 6JbqipiQxuqokKJpdq0ze0iwdb8yp+IPCaof+vPkW/BDhQQhbAP7Knpd57FTIhVZ bxjINsMgkm3G/pQCzHt4CePAmMazs1plmVgKfd8CQcajJvqraoDLrucaPf+Jsm/t JdHq5UgdqI45R48cOY/LMxVp51yRbm3KrdplZbE5bOUyqOx3tfZbi14q44Q3o3st xuVhRjJeaRetSZtb/Bw/SO4q8J3DE36uJrJ7PXF+crcnluHdNHLLa7yc2lCQN5qM OHBSQTnCkm2VfBQmNUgVOz9m/bHL1kUYmtRqpHxTRkKuCojyD8hynF3DvbS9nkfQ UmHjVVR7Oxjn1DNGFhUu/mckylBGmSZHEYlKx1vHkgPHzONhXh2ozHelC49aTvyV JXkdK4mtsZpKvuH0lnKBxN8IQAMR6OffPqrLWr5Jqj0R+PAcugRSBhzlgzjODG7E SqqloyZ2zw7RbEgNH/SU =b1Bf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EbW9baT5kEiXqNDSImDvADa3buKBPHq69--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9de8e191-6b5d-5b89-5c1f-ea9a60849b8d>